In the fast-paced world of product and technology development, decisions are made daily. Teams choose between languages, frameworks, database systems, architectural patterns, and countless other trade-offs. When such decisions are not documented, organizations quickly suffer from institutional knowledge loss, misalignment, and avoidable rework. This is where Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) come into play.
What Are Architecture Decision Records (ADRs)?
An Architecture Decision Record is a short document that captures a single architectural or technical decision made within a project. It documents the context, the alternatives considered, and the rationale behind the decision. Although they originated from software architecture, their applicability has expanded to both technical and product-based decisions in cross-functional teams.
ADRs promote transparency, justification, and alignment across teams. They act as a durable memory, enabling current and future team members to understand why certain paths were taken, even years later.
Why Are ADRs Important?
- Knowledge Retention: Teams scale, people move on, and memories fade. ADRs serve as a reliable record of decisions and prevent knowledge from being siloed.
- Alignment Across Stakeholders: By documenting decisions transparently, ADRs help align product managers, engineers, designers, and leadership with the broader vision.
- Faster Onboarding: New team members can quickly learn the “why” behind the current architecture, tooling, or product choices.
- Avoiding Repetition: Teams no longer waste time reconsidering decisions already evaluated and justified.
- Auditing and Compliance: For industries with regulatory constraints, ADRs help demonstrate due diligence in design and product development.
When to Use ADRs
ADRs should be created for any decision that will have a broad, long-term, or strategic impact. This includes:
- Choosing or switching major technical components (e.g., migrating from MySQL to PostgreSQL)
- Designing high-level product features or workflows (e.g., introducing a freemium pricing model)
- Establishing cross-team conventions (e.g., logging standards or code formatting)
- Adopting or deprecating internal platforms or services
Every decision does not warrant an ADR. Routine or low-impact decisions can be documented through code comments, tickets, or change logs.
Structure of an ADR
Most ADRs follow a lightweight, consistent format. A well-written ADR typically includes the following sections:
- Title: A concise name summarizing the decision (e.g., “Adopt GraphQL for Mobile API”)
- Status: Indicates whether the decision is Proposed, Accepted, Deprecated, or Rejected
- Context: Background and reason for the decision — what problem is being solved?
- Decision: A description of the decision and its scope
- Consequences: Future implications and trade-offs of the decision
- Alternatives Considered: Other options evaluated and why they were not chosen
The tone should be factual, neutral, and informative. The goal is not to justify personalities or opinions, but to document the rationale for posterity.
ADRs in Both Product and Tech
ADRs have traditionally been a tool for architects and developers, but their benefits extend to product teams as well. Consider a product team deciding whether to monetize a feature or keep it free. Writing an ADR ensures the marketing rationale, user research, and revenue projections are preserved and can be re-evaluated when future changes are proposed.
In practice, modern ADRs are often co-authored by product managers and tech leads. This shared authorship enriches the context and broadens buy-in. For example, a decision to prioritize offline mode for a mobile app can include insights about customer requests (product view) and trade-offs in caching technology (technical view).
Best Practices for Writing and Managing ADRs
- Start early: Don’t wait until the decision is final. Draft the ADR during the evaluation phase to document your thought process in real time.
- Keep it short: One page is often enough. A concise record is more likely to be read and referenced.
- Link to references: Add links to diagrams, performance benchmarks, market analysis, or tickets when relevant.
- Use version control: Store ADRs in your repository alongside the code or project documentation.
- Number them sequentially: Keep your ADRs organized by maintaining a running, numerical list (e.g., ADR-001, ADR-002).
- Review regularly: Periodic reviews ensure outdated decisions are revisited and marked deprecated if necessary.
How ADRs Drive a Culture of Thinking
Perhaps the biggest value of ADRs lies in the mindset they promote. By encouraging deliberate and transparent decision-making, ADRs help cultivate a culture that values engineering and product design trade-offs. This focus on rationale over opinion reduces friction between roles and unlocks thoughtful innovation.
Teams that systematically write ADRs also sharpen their analytical communication skills. Writing an ADR often forces a team to confront flawed assumptions or unspoken biases. It becomes a forcing function for critical thinking — leading to better product and technology outcomes.
Examples of Decisions Worth Documenting with ADRs
- Transitioning from a monolith to a microservices architecture
- Switching QA methodology from manual testing to automated pipelines
- Adopting a design system like Material UI across all product interfaces
- Outsourcing certain services instead of building them internally
- Changing user signup flow for better conversion
Even controversial or unsuccessful decisions are worth documenting. A well-known tech phrase captures this perfectly: “Your past decisions are assets, not liabilities — if you document them.”
Conclusion
Architecture Decision Records are more than just documentation—they are a practice of intentional decision-making that fuels transparency, alignment, and long-term efficiency in both product and technical domains. Whether your team is deciding on cloud infrastructure or feature releases, embracing ADRs ensures that your collective knowledge doesn’t vanish into meeting notes or someone’s memory.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
-
Q: Who should be responsible for writing ADRs?
A: Typically, the technical lead or product owner initiates the ADR, but co-authorship is encouraged among all relevant stakeholders. -
Q: What tools do teams use to manage ADRs?
A: Many teams use Markdown files stored in Git repositories. Some teams use documentation tools like Confluence or Notion, as long as they maintain consistency and version control. -
Q: How often should we review old ADRs?
A: A quarterly or semi-annual review is a good practice, especially before major technical or strategic planning cycles. -
Q: Can an ADR be changed after it’s accepted?
A: No ADR is set in stone. Once new information emerges, teams can create a “replacement” ADR that references and supersedes the previous one. -
Q: Should ADRs be used in startups or only large enterprises?
A: ADRs are beneficial for organizations of all sizes. Startups, in particular, benefit from ADRs as they scale quickly and need to retain context as new team members join.
By institutionalizing the practice of ADRs, organizations create a living history of their thinking, enabling more resilient, transparent, and aligned product and technology development.
